Archive

Tag Archives: Browsers

The latest round in the Apple Vs Adobe scwabble has seen a press release published by Apple explaining their position. As they attempt to take a moral high ground, they come off sounding like total hypocrits!

Sure, its easy to take a pop at flash… its bloated, buggy (on linux) and will eat into your system performace like no ones business. But with all that considered, it is responsible for a large amount of the matirial we consume online, and its not going away anytime soon.

But apples opening argument on its press release attempts to slam adobe for its lack of openness. Below I have quoted this section of the PR, as for no excerpts to be taken out of context.

    First, there’s “Open”.

    Adobe’s Flash products are 100% proprietary. They are only available from Adobe, and Adobe has sole authority as to their future enhancement, pricing, etc. While Adobe’s Flash products are widely available, this does not mean they are open, since they are controlled entirely by Adobe and available only from Adobe. By almost any definition, Flash is a closed system.

    Apple has many proprietary products too. Though the operating system for the iPhone, iPod and iPad is proprietary, we strongly believe that all standards pertaining to the web should be open. Rather than use Flash, Apple has adopted HTML5, CSS and JavaScript – all open standards. Apple’s mobile devices all ship with high performance, low power implementations of these open standards. HTML5, the new web standard that has been adopted by Apple, Google and many others, lets web developers create advanced graphics, typography, animations and transitions without relying on third party browser plug-ins (like Flash). HTML5 is completely open and controlled by a standards committee, of which Apple is a member.

    Apple even creates open standards for the web. For example, Apple began with a small open source project and created WebKit, a complete open-source HTML5 rendering engine that is the heart of the Safari web browser used in all our products. WebKit has been widely adopted. Google uses it for Android’s browser, Palm uses it, Nokia uses it, and RIM (Blackberry) has announced they will use it too. Almost every smartphone web browser other than Microsoft’s uses WebKit. By making its WebKit technology open, Apple has set the standard for mobile web browsers.

For Apple to try and take the stand as the ‘good guy’ in an openness and free speech argument is so asburd and hypocrytical that only a fanboy would be sucked in by this garbage.

We all know that the iPhone and iPad are the two most locked down and controlled devices ever brought to market. EVER. Apple control exactly what the hardware is cabable of, through their propriatory OS. Apple control exacly what software is available for the platform, through the app store application process. Apple control exactly how developers make software through their propriatary SDK (mac only) and licence agreement.

By reading the above exerpt, you can see that Apple conveniently ignores all the points i mention, and focuses on web standards, thus conveying Apple as an advocate of openess and free creativity on the web. They believe that web standards should be open, but they don’t believe in openness when it has ramifications to their business model and profits (like in the app store).

Next, Apple gives its self a nice pat on the back for WebKit rendering engine. The wording of this shows Apple in a very positive light to the uniformed.

Apple did not create WebKit. They pillaged the opensource project KHTML, developped by KDE for their Konqueror browser. Apple made a fork of KHTML and named it ‘WebKit’, yet Apple withheld their code, preventing further colaboration with KDE on the project, and violating the initial terms of the licence. Apple eventually open-sourced their code in 2005, but from their behaviour, it is clear that they are not avocates of openness, and will do whatever it takes for their own gain.

So, that beats down every argument put forth by Apple against Adobe in regard to openness. Apple are hypocrits. Steve Jobs is the lead hypocrit. Apple fans are deluded fanboys who follow blindly and accept anything they are told. Apple are denouncing a company for following the same business model as Apple themselves. and that is pure hypocracy.

Please leave a comment if you have an opinion on this.

computer-mouse
Here is a very quick guide on adding mouse support to the text terminal in linux (ubuntu). This is is very useful for text highlighting, copying/pasting but it really comes into its own when browsing the web on the command line with Links2, w3m or any other CLI browser.

The file that needs to be edited is called ’40-permissions.rules’ and you can open it by typing:

sudo leafpad /etc/udev/rules.d/40-permissions.rules

Again, if leafpad isnt your bag, feel free to use whatever editor you want.

Now scroll down to the bottom and add a line like this:

KERNEL=="mice",				MODE="0666"

If you already have KERNEL==”mice”, you can just amend it with MODE=”0666″
Save the file

And you’re done. that was easy wasn’t it? restart your machine, go to a tty window and wiggle your mouse!

Links2 is a command line browser that features graphics… on the command line! It works in the exact same way as links, but by using the -g option, displays correct colours and images. Just check out the screen shot.

Links2 displaying graphics inside the terminal emulator

Links2 displaying graphics inside the terminal emulator

Works perfectly inside X. In order to use outside of X, there are a couple of considerations that must be taken into account namely the use of a framebuffer, and also mouse support

Also, I have only managed to make Links2 graphics mode run outside of X by running as root – using the ‘sudo’ command, which is not ideal. If anyone knows how to make that work without root privilages, please get in touch.

Links2 is available in unbuntu’s standard repositories and cn be installed using ‘sudo apt-get install links2’

Typical usage for graphics mode is ‘links2 -g http://www.google.com’